
Monday, October 20, 2008
S’chach

Saturday, October 18, 2008
Vanity and Vexation of Spirit
On the Saturday of Sukkot, Ecclesiastes is read in the synagogue. I know myself to be something of a curmudgeon, and one who is prone to doubt traditional Judaism’s comprehension of life’s realities on occasion. And every year, Ecclesiastes is there to remind me that cynicism predates me by a couple millennia. Futility of futility, all is futile! Kohelet begins. What profit does man have for all his labor which he toils beneath the sun? A generation goes and a generation comes, but the earth endures forever. I am of no consequence. My work is of no consequence. Whatever has been is what will be, and what has been done is what will be done. There is nothing new under the sun. There is no invention. It is useless to try. For with much wisdom comes much grief, and he who increases knowledge increases pain. Ignorance is bliss. Intellectualism begets only anxiety. And so on.
Wise aphorisms speak across the epochs. The uncaring, unflinching eventuality of death is constant, unavoidable. But lo, the occasioned refrain: I observed that there is nothing better for man than to be happy in what he is doing, for that is his lot. For who can enable him to see what will be after him? Halfheartedly uplifting, at best. A carpe diem as a poetic depressive. Yet it remains truth. There is nothing new, indeed. Cynicism is optimism weathered by experience. I need the reminder, and appreciate it. Ultimately, man cannot fathom the events that transpire under the sun; inasmuch as man labors to seek he shall not find it. And even though a wise man presumes to know, he shall not find it. Bleak, yes, but far from disheartening. The world is as it is, brokers Kohelet. Don’t stress yourself out. They are words for all times, and our times.
Friday, October 17, 2008
Confident, Confident, Dry and Secure

Thursday, October 16, 2008
Smells Like Burning

Wednesday, October 15, 2008
Otherwise Occupied
The legal status of these communities remains in question. I am technically on the other side of the Green Line, meaning I am in the West Bank (where to list my location on Facebook?), though in an area that will likely not be included in any peace agreements (the same for which cannot necessarily be said for the community of Tekoa down the road to the east). Israel claims that the land these towns were built on was public Jordanian land, though some Palestinians dispute this and claim that some it was privately owned. Past the edge of town is a small cluster of caravans (what the Israelis call trailers, after their British overlords) in an outpost whose legality and foundation is more tenuous. I don’t fully understand the issues surrounding the outpost, but I heard that the builder of the one actual house there has a restraining order against him that prevents him from living in the permanent building he built, but the wood house, the only other non-trailer home, is fine because wood houses are legally considered temporary buildings.
I bring this up because I went to the outpost today do drop someone off and saw essentially a trailer park that is seen by some as a human rights violation and others as manifest destiny. I have complicated feelings about “land for peace” and a pragmatic endgame to the conflict, but the thing that bothers me the most is the supposition the Jews living here in the Gush would have to leave and their homes possibly demolished should this land become part of a future Palestinian state. It is a given that anyone of any religion or ethnicity can be a citizen of any modern country. Israel is an increasingly melting pot society, and roughly 10% of the Knesset is Arab. Why, then, would these residents not be allowed to stay as Jewish residents of a future Palestine? Settlement expansion in light of International Law is purportedly a hairy topic, but I see this as a fairly straightforward point. Any voices to the contrary?

Monday, October 13, 2008
Happy Holiday (in the singular)
In unrelated news, I’m intrigued by the prospect of my first one-day yom tov. In ancient times in the land of Israel, the Jewish festival days of Passover, Shavuot, and Sukkot were celebrated for one day. Because the first of the month was decided by the Sanhedrin court in Jerusalem based on witness reports of the new moon, Jewish communities outside the land of Israel could not always be sure what day of the month it was if word from Jerusalem took too long, and therefore celebrated the holidays for two days to be safe. This custom of two-day holidays in the Diaspora persisted even after the standardization of the Jewish calendar, with related halakhic repercussions like the prohibition to cook on the first day for the second day.
Most communities in Israel now keep one day, and there is a lingering question of what visitors to Israel should do: hold two days, as is their custom, or hold one day, as is the custom in the community they are visiting. Some authorities say the former, some say the latter, and some propose a sort of compromise of “one and a half days” where no work is done, but special holiday rituals are not performed either. (The same question pertains to Israelis in the Diaspora, but I won’t get into that.) After considering the issues involved, I decided to hold one day as per minhag ha-makom (custom of the place). Granted this does go against another Jewish tradition of asking your personal rabbi’s opinion, but I’ll call myself a Jewish humanist and leave it at that. Chag sameach.
Sunday, October 12, 2008
Do They Know It's Sukkos?
Then today, among our various errands, we drove out to an outlying community of Jerusalem to buy lights to hang in our sukkah from a woman who sells them out of her house. In a combination of broken Hebrew and broken English, the woman, Asian and married to an Israeli (presumably, though it’s very difficult to get an interfaith marriage in Israel) with a beautiful little girl of about three in a Dora the Explorer shirt, showed us all the various lights she had, and explained that she didn’t know if the lights would survive the rain in the sukkah because she only hangs them around the house. This was a chiloni community, and Micah mused that we were probably the frummest people ever to have ventured there. We bought two awesome strings of lights, and our hosts wished us a chag sameach (happy holiday), though we knew they wouldn’t be celebrating it.
Unlike in America and elsewhere in the Diaspora, Jews are the majority in Israel. Demographics force Diaspora Jews, to some extent, to identify as a unit, despite strong unwillingness to do so by many of them with assorted religious and political leanings. In Israel, Jews are the majority, but the Jews still manage to make things difficult, as they are often wont to do. Here, in an effort to self-define, every little detail is used to separate one group from the next. Various groups dress differently, live separately, and build their own communities. I may have been the only one in shul not wearing a srugi (a kipah srugah, or knitted kipah, mark of the dati leumi, or religious Zionists)—granted my suede one has choochoo trains on it.
But at the same time, as a Jewish state, there is a shared heritage. Everyone here knows it’s Sukkot, regardless of personal religious observance, the same for which cannot be said of America. Here, all the meat in the grocery store is kosher. Traditions, even those of others, are common knowledge. It’s an odd paradox of prizing both personal and national identity. The dichotomy of distancing the other and celebrating commonality is an inherent part of Israeli culture. Achdut, or togetherness, is a virtue here. Kinda.
Friday, October 10, 2008
Dirty Jews
Wednesday, October 8, 2008
Hineni
Tuesday, October 7, 2008
Good Walls and Good Neighbors

I landed yesterday, saw the baby twin cousins for the first time, hung out with the family, and successfully staved off jetlag. The secret: sleep as little as possible the night before—I was at the Rocky Horror Picture Show at the NuArt Saturday night and got four hours of sleep—and as little as possible on the plane—three hours Sunday night thanks to a crying, flailing toddler—then sleep a full night on arrival—Monday night, making sure to stay up to a normal hour—and awake on Israel time. Today I walked the Old City, visited the Kotel, got lost in the maze of stone streets, found my way out to the market at Machane Yehuda and then to Ben Yehuda Street. I saw kids no more than fourteen smoking, fish heaving their last in a bin in the market, live chickens in small cardboard boxes in line for kaparot, two people I knew walking on the street, and lots of walls.
There were bullet-riddled walls, 16th and early 20th century, scarred in the War of Independence. Herodian walls with more recent improvements: the Western Wall with Montefiore’s additions, a sleek new area under Wilson's Arch, and spotless bathrooms. Offices with electrical wiring in plastic runners over the stone and swanky new commercial and residential complexes rising above dilapidating homes and shops. Metal gateways, to markets and holy sites manned by army personnel checking IDs of Arabs, and others keeping everyone out of the rampant construction sites. And off in the distance, the new walls separating Israel from the West Bank, demarcating with cement and steel the boundaries of old feuds. In archeological sites around the city, the past emerges from hiding; generations of building, each directly on top of the last, making strata like that of canyons, with the modern city emerging above it. This is a place adamant about living in the past as it reaches into the future. The struggles are apparent. Languages shout for priority in the streets and on signs, dogma fights dogma for dominance, ethnicities hold to their heritage as they navigate the waters of nationality. There are old walls and new walls, and people who build them and curse them. Welcome to Israel.

